Review Process

The journal adopts a blind peer review process to ensure fairness, objectivity, and academic integrity in the evaluation of submitted manuscripts.

Under this process, the identities of the authors are concealed from the reviewers, and the reviewers’ identities are not disclosed to the authors. This anonymity helps prevent bias and ensures that manuscripts are evaluated solely on their scholarly merit, originality, methodology, and contribution to the field.

Each submitted manuscript that passes the initial editorial screening is sent to independent expert reviewers in the relevant discipline. Reviewers assess the manuscript according to established academic criteria and provide constructive feedback and recommendations, which may include:

• Acceptance without revisions

• Acceptance with minor revisions

• Acceptance with major revisions

• Rejection

Based on the reviewers’ reports, the editorial board makes the final decision regarding the manuscript. Authors are required to address reviewers’ comments and submit revised versions when requested.

The journal is committed to maintaining confidentiality, transparency, and ethical standards throughout the peer review process.